Tool

Test report reader

Type in the figures from a flooring or underlay acoustic test report, and see what each one measures, whether it was measured in a laboratory or on site, and whether it can be compared with your by-law.

Who it is for
  • Committees
  • Strata managers
  • Owners

Every figure on a test report, explained

This is the guidance the tool applies, as plain text. A figure on a report can be compared with a by-law figure only when both are the same rating and both were measured the same way: in a laboratory, or on site.

Ln,w

What it measures
Weighted normalised impact sound pressure level: how loud a standard tapping machine on the floor is in the room below, measured in a laboratory where the sound paths around the floor are suppressed. Lower is quieter.
Laboratory or on site
Laboratory
Standard
Measured in a laboratory under ISO 10140-3:2021 (older reports cite ISO 140-6) and rated under AS ISO 717.2:2024, the Australian adoption of ISO 717-2:2020.
Better is
Lower
Note
The NCC deemed-to-satisfy figure for a floor between apartments is Ln,w not more than 62 (NCC 2022 clause F7D5). A laboratory result rates the tested build-up only.

Sources: ISO 10140-3:2021, laboratory measurement of impact sound insulation; AS ISO 717.2:2024, rating of impact sound insulation (Standards Australia); NCC 2022 Volume One, Part F7 Sound transmission and insulation (ABCB)

ΔLw (also written delta Lw)

What it measures
Weighted reduction in impact sound pressure level: the improvement a floor covering or underlay gives on a bare heavy reference floor in a laboratory. Higher is better. It is not a rating for a whole floor.
Laboratory or on site
Laboratory
Standard
Measured in a laboratory under ISO 10140-3:2021 (older reports cite ISO 140-8) and defined in ISO 717-2:2020 and AS ISO 717.2:2024.
Better is
Higher
Note
It cannot be subtracted from your building's figure. In a Queensland field study, the same five underlays improved a bare slab by 4 to 17 points with no ceiling, and by 4 to 11 points with a plasterboard ceiling.

Sources: ISO 717-2:2020, preview of scope and definitions (CI, ΔLw); ISO 10140-3:2021, laboratory measurement of impact sound insulation; Huang, "Field Floor Impact Noise South-East Queensland (Australia)", Inter-noise 2014

L'nT,w (also written LnT,w, LnTw)

What it measures
Weighted standardised impact sound pressure level, measured in a real building. It includes the sound paths around the floor, the ceiling below and the quality of the installation. Lower is quieter.
Laboratory or on site
On site (field)
Standard
Measured on site under ISO 16283-2:2020 (older reports cite ISO 140-7) and rated under AS ISO 717.2:2024.
Better is
Lower
Note
This is the NCC on-site figure (not more than 62, NCC 2022 clause F7P1), the metric behind AAAC star ratings, and the usual by-law metric.

Sources: ISO 16283-2:2020, field measurement of impact sound insulation; AS ISO 717.2:2024, rating of impact sound insulation (Standards Australia); NCC 2022 Volume One, Part F7 Sound transmission and insulation (ABCB); AAAC, Guideline for Apartment and Townhouse Acoustic Rating, Version 1.0 (June 2017)

L'nT,w + CI (also written LnT,w + CI)

What it measures
The on-site figure L'nT,w with the spectrum adaptation term CI added. ISO 717-2 says CI takes account of the character of walking noise. Lower is quieter.
Laboratory or on site
On site (field)
Standard
Measured on site under ISO 16283-2:2020 (older reports cite ISO 140-7); CI is defined in ISO 717-2:2020 and AS ISO 717.2:2024.
Better is
Lower
Note
The NCC used a + CI figure until 2015 and removed it in 2016, and the AAAC tables use no CI. CI is usually negative on a bare concrete slab, so a figure with + CI is usually lower than the same floor's L'nT,w. In one field case study a bare 190 mm slab measured L'nT,w 69 with CI of -12.

Sources: ISO 717-2:2020, preview of scope and definitions (CI, ΔLw); ABCB, Sound Transmission and Insulation in Buildings Handbook (2022 NCC); Huang, "Field Floor Impact Noise South-East Queensland (Australia)", Inter-noise 2014

IIC (also written Impact Insulation Class)

What it measures
Impact Insulation Class, the American laboratory impact rating. Higher is better, the opposite direction to Ln,w and L'nT,w.
Laboratory or on site
Laboratory
Standard
Measured in a laboratory under ASTM E492 and classified under ASTM E989.
Better is
Higher
Note
IIC uses a different reference curve and fitting rule from the ISO ratings, so there is no exact conversion. ASTM E989 says the rating strictly applies only to the standard tapping machine.

Sources: ASTM E492-22, laboratory impact sound transmission (IIC); ASTM E989-21, classification for impact sound ratings

FIIC (also written Field Impact Insulation Class)

What it measures
Field Impact Insulation Class, the on-site American impact rating. Higher is better.
Laboratory or on site
On site (field)
Standard
Defined in older editions of ASTM E1007 (E1007-04e01). The current ASTM E1007-25 reports AIIC, ISR and NISR instead.
Better is
Higher
Note
Some Queensland body corporate by-laws still use FIIC. In McLeod v Stradbroke Tower and Villas, the adjudicator found FIIC 77 not achievable with hard floors and ordered FIIC 65.

Sources: ASTM E1007-04e01 (historical edition that defined FIIC); ASTM E1007-25, field impact sound transmission; McLeod v Body Corporate for Stradbroke Tower and Villas [2015] QCATA 146

Rw + Ctr

What it measures
Weighted sound reduction index with the low-frequency term Ctr: how well the floor blocks airborne sound such as voices, TV and music, measured in a laboratory. Higher is better. It says nothing about footsteps.
Laboratory or on site
Laboratory
Standard
Rated under AS ISO 717.1:2024 using laboratory measurements (NCC 2022 clause F7D3).
Better is
Higher
Note
The NCC deemed-to-satisfy airborne figure for a floor between apartments is Rw + Ctr not less than 50 (NCC 2022 clause F7D5).

Sources: AS ISO 717.1:2024, rating of airborne sound insulation (Standards Australia); NCC 2022 Volume One, Part F7 Sound transmission and insulation (ABCB)

DnT,w + Ctr

What it measures
Weighted standardised level difference with Ctr: how well the floor blocks airborne sound, measured in a real building. Higher is better. It says nothing about footsteps.
Laboratory or on site
On site (field)
Standard
Measured on site (the NCC guide text names ISO 140-4) and rated under AS ISO 717.1:2024.
Better is
Higher
Note
This is the NCC on-site airborne figure (not less than 45, NCC 2022 clause F7P1) and the AAAC airborne star metric.

Sources: NCC 2022 Volume One, Part F7 Sound transmission and insulation (ABCB); AS ISO 717.1:2024, rating of airborne sound insulation (Standards Australia); AAAC, Guideline for Apartment and Townhouse Acoustic Rating, Version 1.0 (June 2017)

When can a report figure be compared with your by-law?

  • Same rating, same basis: yes. An on-site L'nT,w can be compared with an L'nT,w by-law. An AAAC star by-law is an on-site L'nT,w limit: 2 star less than 65, 3 star less than 55, 4 star less than 50, 5 star less than 45, 6 star less than 40 (AAAC guideline V1.0). Only an AAAC member firm may issue a star certificate.
  • IIC or FIIC against L'nT,w: approximately only. The AAAC says either value can be subtracted from 110 "to approximately indicate the other". In a Queensland field study the sums were 100 to 108, so use it as a range check, not as proof.
  • Laboratory against on site: no. A laboratory test (Ln,w, IIC) suppresses the sound paths around the floor. An on-site test (L'nT,w, FIIC) includes them, with the slab, the ceiling and the workmanship. ISO 10140-3 says laboratory results are not directly applicable to a real building.
  • ΔLw: never. It is the improvement from a covering or underlay on a reference floor, not a rating for your floor, and it cannot be subtracted from your building's figure.
  • With and without + CI: no. CI is usually negative on a concrete slab, so a + CI figure is usually the lower number for the same floor.
  • Airborne figures (Rw + Ctr, DnT,w + Ctr) against an impact by-law: no. They rate voices and music, not footsteps.

Questions to ask the supplier

  1. Can you send the full test report, not a brochure page or a summary figure?
  2. Is the figure a laboratory result (Ln,w, ΔLw or IIC) or an on-site result (L'nT,w or FIIC)?
  3. What exact build-up was tested: which floor covering, which underlay and thickness, and which adhesive or fixing?
  4. What slab type and thickness was it tested on, and was there a ceiling below?
  5. Is there an on-site test (ISO 16283-2) of the same build-up?
  6. Can you give the result in the rating my by-law uses, measured the way my by-law requires?
  7. Does the figure include + CI?
  8. If you claim a star rating, which AAAC member firm issued the certificate, and for which building?
  9. Who carried out the test, who paid for it, and on what date?
  10. Does the report carry a NATA endorsement, and is the test inside that lab's scope of accreditation?
  11. Does the report include the frequency table or graph behind the single number?
  12. Which installation details did the result depend on, such as a gap at the walls or an isolation strip under the skirting?

Based on the report contents in the ABCB handbook (Appendix D.3.3), the statement of results in ISO 717-2, NATA's guide to test reports and the AAAC explanatory note.

General information, not legal or acoustic advice. Check your scheme's registered by-laws and the requirements for your building.

How this tool works

The tool reads each figure you enter against a fixed table of rating definitions from the ISO and ASTM standards, the National Construction Code and the AAAC guideline. It runs in your browser and does not send or store what you type.

It compares a report figure with your by-law figure only when both are the same rating and both were measured the same way, in a laboratory or on site. The one exception is the AAAC's rule of thumb between IIC or FIIC and L'nT,w, which the tool always marks as approximate. It never supplies a pass mark of its own: the only limits it uses are the AAAC star limits and the figure you type in from your by-law.

The notes about slabs, ceilings and underlays come from a published field study of South-East Queensland apartment buildings. The questions for the supplier follow the report contents listed in the ABCB sound handbook (Appendix D.3.3), the ISO 717-2 statement of results and NATA guidance.

Questions, answered

Can a supplier's acoustic certificate show that my floor will meet the by-law?

Only if it gives the same rating your by-law uses, measured the same way, and even then it describes another building, room or laboratory set-up. In two NSW tribunal cases, floors approved on a supplier's certificate later measured worse on site: 60 and 61 L'nT,w against an approved 5 star level in Kim, and 51 and 54 against a certificate of 44 in Jiang v Sui. The AAAC says the finished floor should be tested for certainty.

What is the difference between Ln,w and L'nT,w on a test report?

Ln,w is measured in a laboratory, where the sound paths around the floor are suppressed. L'nT,w is measured in a real building, so it includes those paths, the ceiling below and the quality of the installation. Both are lower-is-better, but they are not the same measurement and cannot be compared with each other.

Can I convert an IIC or FIIC figure to L'nT,w?

Only roughly. The AAAC says either value can be subtracted from 110 to approximately indicate the other, so FIIC 65 is roughly L'nT,w 45. A Queensland field study found the two added up to between 100 and 108, so use the conversion as a range check and ask for the rating your by-law uses.

What does the ΔLw figure on an underlay data sheet tell me?

It is the laboratory improvement the underlay or covering gives on a standard bare heavy floor, and higher is better. It is not a rating for your floor, it cannot be compared with a by-law figure, and it cannot be subtracted from your building's figure, because the improvement changes with the slab, the ceiling and the floor on top.

Does the tool keep the figures I type in?

No. The tool runs in your browser and does not send or store anything you type. Use the copy or print button to keep the result.

A useful place to start

Make room for a smoother approval.

Keep the details together with our strata flooring approval checklist, ready for your next conversation with the committee.

Unsubscribe at any time. How we care for your details.